1

JaFaJ

Kurdish leaders meet as Iraqi political deadlock continues

Iraq’s two major Kurdish parties have been trying to reach a compromise between the two, but to no avail.
 

Supporters of the Kurdistan Democratic Party celebrate with the KDP party flags during Iraq’s parliamentary election in Erbil, Iraqi Kurdistan, Oct. 10, 2021. – Safin Hamed/AFP via Getty Images


Mustafa Saadoun
@SaadoonMustafa

www.al-monitor.com

August 11, 2022

The UN secretary-general’s envoy to Iraq visited Aug. 10 the city of Erbil, capital of the Kurdistan Region, to attend a meeting of the leaders of the Kurdish political blocs, in the presence of President of Iraqi Kurdistan Nechirvan Barzani.
The visit was upon Barzani’s invitation and amid deepening divisions between the two major parties in the Kurdistan Region.
The attendees’ statement after the meeting read, “Nechirvan Barzani expressed his hope that the political parties would reach an understanding on setting a date for holding the elections and resolving the problems.”
According to the statement, the president said, “The delay in the elections harms the Kurdistan Region’s reputation and prestige.”
The differences between the two main parties — the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), which represent the two most prominent Kurdish families, the Barzani and Talabani families — are not something new.
Decades of conflict between the two sides culminated in an armed conflict in the 1990s. Today, the conflict is essentially a political struggle over influence in state institutions and representation in the Baghdad-based Iraqi central government.
Furthermore, Iraqi Kurdistan is witnessing frequent protests every once a while, most recently early this week in Erbil, Dahuk and Sulaimaniyah against both parties, mostly against the KDP that has more power share in the region, demanding for salaries that were delayed for months and other services and citizen rights.
After the Iraqi parliamentary elections in October 2021, however, the dispute between the two flared over the Kurdish presidential candidate, and has exacerbated further with the parliamentary elections in the Kurdistan Region fast approaching.
Over the past 10 months, a series of meetings and talks have taken place, but to no avail — until the most recent meeting that brought together Aug. 4 KDP leader Massoud Barzani and PUK leader Bafel Talabani, during which there was somewhat of a breakthrough.
Prominent KDP official Bankin Rekani told Al-Monitor, “The Kurdish parties are on the verge of putting an end to the differences and reaching positive results.”
He said, “The meeting that brought Barzani together with Bafel Talabani was the basis to ending the disputes. The two sides appear both ready to agree on the disputed files, and this will become clear soon.”
The two parties are vying for the post of the president of Iraq, which has been allocated to the Kurds in Iraq, as per tradition since 2003.
Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, however, lent its support to the PUK candidate, Barham Salih, which deepened the crisis between the two parties, pushing each side to dig in their heels.
Disputes between the two parties are not limited to the federal government positions only; they also revolve around governance issues in the Kurdistan Region, how to deal with political developments and the opposition expansion, oil and gas investments and the division of resources between the major governorates of Erbil and Sulaimaniyah, with the latter being financially marginalized prompting protesters to demonstrate against the dire situation every now and then.
The PUK, which controls Sulaimaniyah, fears the KDP’s attempt to expand its influence over all areas.
According to Rizan Sheikh Diler, the PUK’s political adviser, does not agree with Rekani’s statements about an imminent agreement between the two sides, stressing that the recent meeting between the two leaders did not bring anything new to the table.
“The meetings are futile. Both sides are insisting on their decisions, and each has its own independent government. The only victims here are the governorates in Kurdistan that are affected by these ongoing differences,” she told Al-Monitor. “The crisis is likely to exacerbate in Kurdistan, especially with the upcoming legislative elections in the region slated for October.”
Up until 2018, the Kurds would run for the parliamentary elections under the same alliance called the “Kurdistan Alliance”; then they were on separate tickets.
In the 2021 parliamentary elections, the Kurds joined opposition lists; Barzani joined forces with the leader of the Sadrist movement, Muqtada al-Sadr, and Talabani joined the Shiite Coordination Framework, which is close to Iran.
“The recent meeting in Erbil Aug. 10 in the presence of the UN envoy did not have any positive outcome,” another Kurdish well-informed source told Al-Monitor on condition of anynomity.
Bilal Wahab, researcher at the Washington Institute, said in an article Aug. 1, “Washington has failed to use its remarkable influence with the two Kurdish parties, which includes providing direct annual aid of $240 million.”
The tense situation in Baghdad and the major parties’ failure to reach understandings with some calling to dissolve parliament and hold early elections undoubtedly affects the situation in Iraqi Kurdistan, especially since the two Kurdish parties have joined two opposing alliances in the capital.

Read more: https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2022/08/kurdish-leaders-meet-iraqi-political-deadlock-continues#ixzz7bnfyNX00

... continue reading.

Kurdish leaders meet as Iraqi political deadlock continues Read More »

Is Iraq’s political chaos spreading to the Kurdistan region?

Issued on: 12/08/2022 – 19:23 – France24.com

Security forces deployed in Sulaimaniyah in Iraq’s autonomous Kurdistan region on August 6, 2022. © Shwan Mohammed, AFP

Text by:Marc DAOU

Iraqi Kurdistan, the autonomous zone considered a haven of stability in a war-torn country, has been roiled in recent days by political tensions. A violent crackdown on an anti-government protest last weekend and the arrest of parliamentarians from an opposition party have sparked alarm bells in the region.

The northern Iraqi autonomous zone of Kurdistan appears to be catching up with the chaos and political stability that has gripped Iraq since the October 2021 parliamentary elections.
On Saturday, August 6, security forces in Kurdistan fired tear gas and rubber-coated bullets to disperse anti-government protests in Sulaimaniyah. The opposition New Generation party had called for protests in Sulaimaniyah and other cities in the autonomous region to demand better living conditions and for regional elections to be held on the scheduled date.
Six New Generation lawmakers in the federal parliament in Baghdad as well as a local member of the regional parliament were arrested before being released hours later. Forty New Generation members were among the nearly 600 people arrested that day, according to the opposition party.
In addition, “at least 60 journalists were targeted by the police” during the demonstrations, according to the NGO, Reporters Without Borders. Of the 26 journalists arrested, “at least 10 were journalists from the NRT TV station, which is owned by Shaswar Abdulwahid, a businessman and founder of the New Generation party.
US, France express ‘concern’
The crackdown underscored the tensions in the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG), which has been dominated by the rival Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK).
The autonomous region’s Western allies were quick to condemn Saturday’s violence. On August 8, the US embassy in Baghdad expressed its “concern” over the use of violence by the security forces and urged local authorities to “review these actions and reaffirm the vital roles that a free press, peaceful assembly, and the rule of law play in a democracy”.

This concern was shared by several EU nations, including France, which called on the KRG “to uphold public freedoms” in a statement issued on August 7 by its consulate general in Erbil.
In recent years, Kurdistan local authorities have been singled out by several international rights groups, including Human Rights Watch, for human rights violations.
“The main Western partners of Kurdistan were very quick to condemn the weekend’s events because, since 2003, and until recently, the KRG embodied in their eyes an alternative model of stability in relation to the powers that be in the region,” said Adel Bakawan, founder and director of the Paris-based French Centre for Research on Iraq (CFRI). “Its main strength, if not the only one, is this image, cultivated for decades, of a land of cultural and political diversity, very symbolically consecrated by Pope Francis’ March 2021 visit to Erbil.”
Tensions on national, international levels
The crackdown comes at a disquieting time in Iraq and the Kurdish autonomous region, said Bakawan.
“It must be noted that there is a certain nervousness within the KRG, which can be explained by several factors. These include the international context, which has been disrupted by the economic and geopolitical fallout of the war in Ukraine, as well as political chaos in Iraq, which can, at any time, tip into civil war and directly threaten the security and stability of Kurdistan,” he explained.
Bakawan believes that a resurgence of the Islamic State (IS) group also poses a threat to the autonomous Kurdish territory. In addition, recent Turkish attacks on the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) – which Turkey and its allies consider a terrorist group – have caused many civilian casualties in northern Iraq.
“The KRG, which is also under pressure due to tensions with Baghdad over the management of Kurdistan’s oil wealth, seems to favour the security approach to deal with a number of issues and maintain security and stability in the territory. This is to the detriment of dialogue and interaction,” he said.
Two historical parties, two powerful clans
In addition to the international and national contexts, the Kurdish territory is also shaken by internal political rivalries. “We must keep in mind the highly political nature of the events of August 6, which the two camps, the KRG and New Generation, are trying to exploit,” said Bakawan.
He explained that around the time New Generation leader Abdulwahid issued a call for protests, in the Iraqi capital, Baghdad, supporters of influential Shiite leader Moqtada al-Sadr were staging a sit-in outside parliament.
Sadr’s supporters have staged the sit-in since July over a political stalemate that followed the October 2021 elections. The Iraqi Shiite cleric was the biggest winner but failed to form a government free of Iranian-backed parties.
He withdrew his lawmakers from parliament and is now preventing the chamber from electing a new government. Sadr is instead demanding early elections.
Abdulwahid’s call for protests in Kurdistan’s cities were not widely followed by the Kurdish population since the demonstrations were mainly composed of New Generation supporters and elected officials, explained Bakawan. “Even if the mobilisation against corruption and living conditions are totally legitimate, the New Generation approach was considered demagogic and political by those among the populace who totally reject the entire political class and no longer believe their discourse,” he explained.
The New Generation Movement’s attempt to position itself as an alternative to the current power perplexes experts such as Bakawan. “It is led by a wealthy businessman considered a part of the system, without a clearly defined ideological line: is it an Iraqi nationalist party? A Kurdish movement? Is it liberal? It is not clear. For example, Shaswar Abdulwahid strongly supports the Shiite leader Moqtada al-Sadr, while resolutely opposing Sadr’s Kurdish ally, the KDP,” said Bakawan.
The party, which was founded in 2018, won nine of the 64 seats allocated to the Kurds in the Iraqi national parliament in the October elections.
In Kurdistan, it is competing and trying to challenge the domination of the two main parties, which are led by rival political families.
The KDP was founded in 1946 by the late Mustafa Barzani and is currently led by his son, Massoud Barzani. The PUK was co-founded by the late Jalal Talabani in 1975 and is currently led by his son, Bafel Talabani.
The KRG is led by KDP deputy chief, President Nechirvan Barzani, who is the nephew of Massoud Barzani and grandson of party founder Mustafa Barzani.
The Barzani clan powerbase is in northern Kurdistan while the Talabani family dominates southern Kurdistan.
“It is especially in the south, in the Talabani stronghold, that New Generation has wrested the vast majority of its nine parliamentary seats, a significant figure since the PUK won only 18 seats,” explained Bakawan.
This tough political tug of war between the PUK – which is well established historically, financially, militarily and administratively – and New Generation, which does not have the same resources, is reflected in tensions on the ground.

From a purely political point of view, the August 6 crackdown suggests that the authorities are very wary of New Generation ahead of the upcoming regional legislative elections. The poll was scheduled for early October, but has been postponed to a later date.
The postponement of the Kurdish regional elections has been another source of political tensions. On Thursday, UN special representative for Iraq, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, called on all parties to resolve their differences to end the political deadlock, according to media reports. The key issues surrounding the upcoming vote include the composition of the electoral commission as well as calls to amend the region’s decades-old election law.
While a date has not been set for regional elections, Kurdish leaders have said they will be held before the end of the year, said Bakawan.
“The PUK and the KDP, two rivals who see themselves as the builders of Kurdistan and the guarantors of its stability, are certainly afraid of losing part of their electorate to other political forces, even though this scenario seems unlikely, given that the opposition is so divided between different secular, Islamist and liberal currents that it is difficult to bring them together in the same block,” concluded Bakawan.

... continue reading.

Is Iraq’s political chaos spreading to the Kurdistan region? Read More »

Libyan parliament calls for an immediate cessation of Israeli military operations on Gaza Strip

 August 10, 2022 – 22:33 – The Libya Observer – www.libyaobserver.ly
 Written by: Mohamed Ahmed

 
The House of Representatives’ Foreign Affairs Committee has held the Israeli occupation forces responsible for the civilian victims left behind after its attack on the Gaza Strip.
This came in the committee’s statement, on Tuesday, against the continuous attack of the Israeli occupation forces on the Gaza Strip, which caused heavy human casualties and material losses.
It called on the international community to work for an immediate cessation of military operations and to assume its responsibilities to protect civilians and hold those targeting them accountable, reaffirming the Libyan people’s support for the Palestinian people.
The statement further called on the Arab and Islamic countries to take a unified and decisive stance regarding the Israeli crimes against the Palestinians, targeting unarmed civilians and destroying infrastructure on Palestinian areas.

... continue reading.

Libyan parliament calls for an immediate cessation of Israeli military operations on Gaza Strip Read More »

Hamas issues, rescinds sweeping regulations on journalists in Gaza

Journalists were told not to report on rockets falling short in the enclave, and to blame Israel for the latest conflict with Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

 
Terrorist groups in Rafah launch rockets towards Israel, on August 7, 2022. Photo by Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90.

 
August 10, 2022 / JNS) Hamas issued and then withdrew sweeping restrictions on foreign journalists working in the Gaza Strip in the aftermath of this week’s conflict between Israel and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, according to the Associated Press.

The restrictions included a ban on coverage about PIJ rockets falling short in Gaza and causing injuries and deaths, as well as a general rule requiring that Jerusalem be blamed for the latest escalation, according to the report.

The Foreign Press Association, which represents international media in Israel, announced that the regulations were scrapped following discussions with the terrorist group.
“Such a move would have constituted a severe, unacceptable and unjustifiable restriction on the freedom of the press, as well as the safety of our colleagues in Gaza,” the FPA said in a statement cited by AP.
The report nevertheless suggested that Hamas’s initiative has made clear its future expectations, which could have a “chilling” effect on reportage from Gaza.

Hamas already requires all visiting journalists to have a local sponsor, generally a Palestinian colleague or a translator hired by the given news outlet. Under the now-defunct restrictions, sponsors were warned they must “demonstrate national spirit, defend the Palestinian narrative and reject the foreigner’s bias to the Israeli narrative,” according to AP.
Sponsors would have also been required to inform Hamas of “any suspicious behavior or illogical questions” by foreign journalists, and to submit a full report of what journalists did in Gaza, in addition to links to all published works.
During the three days of Israel’s “Operation Breaking Dawn,” Gaza terrorists fired some 1,000 rockets towards Israel, approximately 200 of which landed in Gaza.
In one instance, a PIJ rocket misfired and caused an explosion in a residential area of Jabalya that killed numerous people, including four children. While Palestinian media initially reported that the deaths were caused by an Israeli airstrike, the IDF refuted the claim by releasing footage of the incident.
Meanwhile, during a live broadcast on Aug. 7, Lebanon’s Mayadeen TV caught a PIJ rocket malfunctioning and coming down in a Gaza neighborhood. A few moments later, a voice is heard instructing the cameraman, who followed the missile’s course, to “please, turn the camera away, turn the camera upwards.”
According to the Israeli military, more noncombatants were killed by PIJ rockets during the conflict than by Israeli strikes.

... continue reading.

Hamas issues, rescinds sweeping regulations on journalists in Gaza Read More »

As Gaza’s factions vie for influence, civilians bear the cost of war

As Gaza’s factions vie for influence, civilians bear the cost of war

By 
 and 

Hazem Balousha
 The Washington Post

August 11, 2022 at 4:00 a.m. EDT

Palestinians sit in the ruins of their home after Israeli airstrikes over the weekend in the Gaza Strip. (Mohammed Saber/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock)

GAZA CITY — Safa Shamalakh sat in a shady doorway and stared at the tangle of concrete and metal that was once her home. An Israeli missile, targeting the apartment of a suspected Palestinian Islamic Jihad operative next door, had demolished both structures last weekend. She and her neighbors were warned to evacuate in the minutes before the blast.

For the complete article, please click here

 

washingtonpost.com © 1996-2022 The Washington Post

... continue reading.

As Gaza’s factions vie for influence, civilians bear the cost of war Read More »

Hamas attempts to muzzle foreign journalists covering latest Gaza conflict

Hamas orders journalists not to report on Islamic Jihad misfires and rockets hitting inside the Strip, and to blame Israel for the latest conflict, but later rescinds sweeping restrictions.

By  JNS and ILH Staff
 Published on  08-11-2022 08:46
Last modified: 08-11-2022 08:46

Journalists cover an Israeli airstrike on Gaza City, Aug. 6, 2022 | File photo: AFP/Mohammed Abed

Hamas, the terrorist group controlling the Gaza Strip, issued sweeping new restrictions on journalists after the recent conflict there, but then rescinded them, a group representing foreign media in Israel and the Palestinian territories said Tuesday.

 
Palestinians who work with foreign journalists were first informed of the new rules earlier this week in messages sent by the Hamas-run Interior Ministry. They were ordered not to report on Gazans killed by misfired Palestinian rockets or the military capabilities of Palestinian terrorist groups and were told to blame Israel for the recent escalation.
The Foreign Press Association, which represents international media, including The Associated Press, said the guidelines were rescinded after discussions with authorities in Gaza.
The FPA said in a statement that “such a move would have constituted a severe, unacceptable and unjustifiable restriction on the freedom of the press, as well as the safety of our colleagues in Gaza,” Salama Marouf, director of the government media office in Gaza, confirmed the reversal. “There are no restrictions,” he said. “We welcome all foreign journalists and media into Gaza and we call on them to come.”
The rules would have gone much further than existing Hamas restrictions. They appeared aimed at imposing the Islamic terrorist group’s narrative on media coverage of the conflict by implicitly threatening Palestinian reporters and translators who live under its heavy-handed rule.
Even if the rules are officially withdrawn, Hamas has still signaled its expectations, which could have a chilling effect on critical coverage.
Hamas’ attempt this week to muzzle the foreign media came after it sat out Operation Breaking Dawn – the latest conflict with Israel. The decision to stay on the sidelines likely reflects Hamas’ desire to preserve economic understandings with Israel that have somewhat eased a 15-year blockade imposed by Israel and Egypt after the Hamas takeover.
After a Gaza ceasefire took hold Monday, following three days of fighting between Israel and Hamas’ smaller sister group Islamic Jihad, Gaza’s Interior Ministry distributed a written copy of the rules to Palestinians applying for entry permits on behalf of foreign media outlets, with instructions to communicate them to the foreign journalists in their “own local way.”
Hamas, which seized power in Gaza in a military coup in 2007 from rival Palestinian forces, requires all visiting reporters to have a local sponsor – usually a Palestinian journalist or translator hired by the news outlet.
Under the now rescinded restrictions, sponsors were told they must accompany the journalists during their reporting and will be held responsible for what they produce. The sponsors were warned that they must “demonstrate national spirit, defend the Palestinian narrative and reject the foreigner’s bias to the Israeli narrative.”
They would have also been required to inform Hamas of “any suspicious behavior or illogical questions” outside the scope of journalistic work, and to submit a full report to Hamas of what the journalists did in Gaza, in addition to links to all published works.
The guidelines appeared to suggest that writing about forbidden topics like the rocket misfires – or about the media guidelines themselves – could have led to the revocation of local sponsorship. For a Palestinian journalist in Gaza, that would have meant the loss of vital income in a blockaded territory where unemployment hovers around 50%.
In many respects, Gaza became a much safer place for reporters after the Hamas takeover, when the group imposed order and put an end to kidnappings and factional violence. But as Hamas consolidated control – and went on to fight four wars and countless smaller battles with Israel – it steadily imposed more and more restrictions on media.
In recent years, Hamas has required journalists to apply for advance approval to film in certain locations, such as the Gaza fishing port, the beach and the gold market.
Hamas has also barred Palestinians from working for Israeli media or providing services to them. Palestinians are also barred from giving interviews to Israeli outlets.

... continue reading.

Hamas attempts to muzzle foreign journalists covering latest Gaza conflict Read More »

Saudi Arabia, UAE Criticize Palestinian Islamic Jihad Rocket Attacks on Israel

They questioned why the Gaza-based terror group was acting for the benefit of Iranian interests, arguing that the conflict erupted due to Iran’s desire to expedite nuclear talks in Vienna.
By JNS – August 11, 2022
Following the military conflict between the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) and Israel from Aug. 5-7, criticism was leveled in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates against the terror organization entrenched in the Gaza Strip, appearing in both the press and social media.
According to a report by MEMRI, critics claimed, among other things, that the PIJ is an Iranian proxy organization acting for the benefit of Iranian interests and thus inflicting suffering on Gaza residents.
Further, they argued that the conflict erupted due to Iran’s desire to expedite nuclear talks in Vienna. One writer criticized the launch of Iranian missiles from within the civilian population in Gaza.

 

Elements in Saudi Arabia and the UAE also mocked recent statements by commanders of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) warning that Israel would pay a high price for its crimes in Gaza and that Hezbollah would strike Israel hard when the time was right. They questioned why Iran was not following through on its threats.
In a lengthy front-page report on Sunday, the London-based UAE daily Al-Arab criticized the PIJ, writing that “Gaza again became an arena for the settling of accounts between Iran and Israel, when the Palestinian citizens are the ones paying the price.”
Saudi journalist Tariq Al-Homayed mocked Iran and PIJ in his Sunday column in the Al-Sharq Al-Awsat daily: “The question addressed here to the Qods Force commander and all members of the mendacious resistance is: When will ‘the time be right’ to remove Israel from the map and the globe? And why not [do it] now in response to Israel’s focused attack on Gaza, especially against the [Palestinian] Islamic Jihad movement?”

... continue reading.

Saudi Arabia, UAE Criticize Palestinian Islamic Jihad Rocket Attacks on Israel Read More »

Crack widens in Tunisia-US relations

The rift is growing between Tunisia and one of its main donors, the United States, as President Kais Saied continues his power grab leaning on authoritarian Algeria.
US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said Tunisia’s “dream of self-government” was in danger.
His comment added to previous US criticism in the wake of the adoption of a controversial constitution that further empowers the President and undermines the country’s post-2011 democratic gains.
“Across Africa, those who support democracy and freedom and the rule of law are battling the forces of autocracy, chaos and corruption,” Austin said at a US Africa Command ceremony.
“We can feel those headwinds in Tunisia, where people inspired the world with their demands for democracy”, he said.
Last month, President Saied organized the referendum on the constitution which bolsters his powers, a year after he suspended the parliament launching a process of power grab that left pro-democracy activists warning the country is backpedaling to autocracy.
Those who voted yes represented 94.6% of all voters, though turnout stands at a mere 30%.
“Tunisia has experienced an alarming erosion of democratic norms over the past year and reversed many of the Tunisian people’s hard-won gains since 2011,” Secretary of State Antony Blinken said following the referendum.
Tunisian foreign minister summoned US ambassador over Washington’s comments which he described as an interference in the country’s domestic issues.
Tensions with Washington and the backpedaling to authoritarianism has already pushed the US to cut its aid to Tunisia.
The standoff with the US and political instability that the slide towards autocracy may trigger will also cast a shadow over Tunisia’s quest to obtain a lifeline from the IMF to avert the crumbling of its public finances.
Morgan Stanley’s ranked Tunisia, along with Ukraine and El Salvador, in the top three list of likely defaulters.

... continue reading.

Crack widens in Tunisia-US relations Read More »

Egyptian Parliament’s Saturday emergency session to discuss reshuffle that includes 13 ministries: Reports

www.egypttoday.com –  Sat, 13 Aug 2022 – 08:59 GMT

 

CAIRO – 13 August 2022: The Egyptian House of Representatives will hold an emergency session on Saturday to discuss a cabinet reshuffle for 13 ministerial portfolios, according to Extra News.
Parliament’s secretary-general Ahmed Manaa said in a statement Friday that the House will hold an emergency session on Saturday at noon to discuss an “urgent file”.
The House will convene as per an invitation by President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi to consider a cabinet reshuffle, confirmed Extra News.
The members of the House already started to flock to the Parliament’s headquarters to hold the emergency session.

... continue reading.

Egyptian Parliament’s Saturday emergency session to discuss reshuffle that includes 13 ministries: Reports Read More »

Armenian Ambassador to Qatar, Deputy Speaker of Consultative Assembly discuss cooperation

15:20, 10 August 2022 – ArmenPress.AM
YEREVAN, AUGUST 10, ARMENPRESS. Armenian Ambassador to Qatar Armen Sargsyan had a meeting with Hamda bint Hassan Al Sulaiti, the Deputy Speaker of the Qatari parliament – officially known as the Consultative Assembly or the Shura Council.

The embassy said in a statement that the discussion focused on a broad range of issues relating to the deepening and expanding of the inter-parliamentary cooperation between the two countries, intensifying contacts between parliamentary friendship groups and encouraging mutual-visits of parliamentary delegations.

... continue reading.

Armenian Ambassador to Qatar, Deputy Speaker of Consultative Assembly discuss cooperation Read More »